" Maine Bikers Helping Maine Bikers "
Do we need more enforcement? I'm not talking about loud pipes, or inspection stickers, any anything involving motorcycles being in the wrong. We hear enough about that. Laws and enforcement designed to restrict motorcycles in some shape or form is part of daily life for most of us these days.
But this time I am talking about when motorcycles are in the right, and cagers are in the wrong. Have you ever been cut off while riding your bike? Of course you have. And sometimes it may have even been on purpose. Sometimes it's not just an annoyance. Sometimes it causes accidents. Damaged bikes and even damaged bodies.
The question I have for everyone is how often are the cagers getting away with it? I have been hearing stories lately where cars have cut off motorcycles, caused accidents and were not charged with anything by law enforcement. If this happening, why?
Are vehicle operators being let off the hook because it was Just a Motorcycle? Are the LEO's that are responding to these situations just being lazy? Or are the laws we currently have not enough to make cagers accountable for dangerous driving?
Do we need better laws?
Do we need better law enforcement?
Or is this not even a problem.
Please keep in mind this discussion is not a Biker vs LEO discussion. Many police officers ride themselves. But I have been asked about this more than once and think we as a motorcycle community should discuss it. And see if any action should be taken.
What do you think?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Joshua Herndon on August 16, 2011 at 8:27pm I think that the Right of Way (RoW) violation issue is a nationwide problem. In my position as the state rep for the Motorcycle Riders Foundation I see e-mails from state reps all over the country that are about someone being cut down by an automobile that violated their right of way. The subsequent information is generally that the operator of the offending vehicle was not ticketed with a RoW violation because they claimed that they just did not see the motorcycle. Even IF they are charged with the RoW, the fine is so small as to be meaningless. Some states charge as little as 87 dollars for the infraction. There has been a push by some state MROs to stiffen up the penalties for this, but it is always a struggle to get laws enacted for this purpose. A few states have been sucessful passing legislation that makes the RoW violator more accountable, but it is still too early to tell if it is having an impact on the accident rate where RoW violations are at fault.
It is a subject that I think needs to be researched to find out just how often it happens in our state and if it would be feasible to submitt legislation to try and bring accountability to the violators if it is found to be a serious problem here.
Most all the legislation I have seen deals with a RoW that results in injury or death. I don't know how you would deal with a situation where someone was cut off and it resulted in an accident.
Permalink Reply by The Duc on August 16, 2011 at 8:37pm Frankly I got cut off, pulled in front of and narrowly avoided several potentially serious accidents both in my car and on the bike this past weekend. My motorcycle awareness saved me once in my car (habit of always checking the rearview). The drivers either were not paying attention or shouldn't have a license as they are not capable of driving safely or driving at all for that matter. I followed two of the "drivers" after a couple serious incidents and confronted them and quickly realized they didn't have the brains of a gnat. I don't like doing that cause you never know what they'll do but sometimes I can't help myself. Seems to me if you have been issued a drivers license and can speak you should at least be able to construct coherent sentences. They were barely able to complete a sentence and obviously didn't give a crap that they had nearly caused a potential fatal accident. I'm thinking we just need to get the current laws, especially the distracted driving one (both serious incidents because of cellphone use) enforced and throw the habitual offenders in jail and loose the key.
Can you say never going to happen...
At least it's good to vent.
Permalink Reply by Mark Elliott on August 17, 2011 at 5:22am I is a good question Jeff. I hear the same stories....... I agree with Josh that our ROW incidents need to be looked at. Failure to yield resulting in an accident should carry a stiffer penalty. I think the biking community (UBM maybe) should also look at either advising OR actually taking part in todays drivers education courses in an effort to teach "small vehicle awareness". Since manufacturers are making cars smaller once again some of those drivers may now understand how we feel. If you've ever taken a hunting course, one thing many of them teach you is to not only recognize deer, but ALSO recognize "parts" of a deer. Drivers of all vehicles need to be taught to recognize "parts" of a motorcycle too...... A hunter will spot a white tail a mile away, but drivers can't spot a motorcycle approaching at 50 feet. It's because the hunter was taught to do so.
When all else fails, there is civil court. Many times a driver is not summonsed or even found "not guilty" in criminal courts but found guilty in civil court. It is a pain in the ass to have to do that but it is an option. To avoid this, if you are in an accident where your right of way was ignored, you should insist that charges be filed. You can do that......
Permalink Reply by Randy LONRNGR on August 17, 2011 at 8:47am
Permalink Reply by Mark Elliott on August 18, 2011 at 5:54am
Permalink Reply by AngelRyd18 on August 19, 2011 at 9:28am
Permalink Reply by Jacqueline on August 19, 2011 at 9:35am
Permalink Reply by Gerry Alden on August 21, 2011 at 11:23am
Permalink Reply by Gerry Alden on September 14, 2011 at 11:31am Steve you said, "that cause motorcycle accidents", as if an accident has a cause an effect that removes responsibility of the rider. The way I see it, while operating around intersections and driveways, any approaching car potentially can turn left, violating my path. Any rider who fails to defend against the possibility of a predictable crash, is at fault for not protecting their own life and property. Research studies report the driver of left turning cars, never saw the cyclists'. The light waves travelling off an approaching motorcycle is not "seen" by the eyes of the driver, but by the cognitive abilities of the brain to decipher the danger of turning. Which one of the 10,000 synapses of the 10 Billion brain cells in the human brain do you want law enforcement to find faulty to prove who is liable?
Maybe every cage should be required to have a sticker on the inside windshield, like a warning on a packet of cigarettes. Warning: Turning in front of a cyclist causing a crash will land you in jail. Yup we all know how well that works.
Steve Fuller said:
I think we do need some law enforcement for those cagers that cause motorcycle accidents and injury Jeff. Just last night a cager started to cut in front of me to turn into a hotel on the whitten rd in augusta and then when i gestured to him, no not the finger, he yelled at me like it was my fault..and this isn't the first time this has happened. The cagers need to be held accountable if they cause accidents and injury.
© 2012 Created by Jeff Neil MBN Founder.